26 July 2024Westminster viewAs Labour’s plan to create a state-owned energy investment vehicle, GB Energy, has been clarified, greater scrutiny is being given to the implications of what taking direct government stakes in renewable energy projects would have. The claim made at the election that this could somehow save consumers £300 a year has also been exposed as misleading, and the notion that a zero emissions electricity grid by 2030 is even possible is questioned by many energy experts. At the heart of Miliband’s proposals is a desire to increase the amount of electricity generated by wind and solar - so it’s crucial for the public to understand whether these technologies represent value for money and what impact they will have on the grid, and therefore on bills. Two excellent new blog posts on our website (links below), both by experienced energy experts, examine these questions: Bruno Prior looks in detail at how we should value both renewable energy itself, and the carbon savings it generates, and finds the Government’s subsidy scheme to be over-generous. Deri Hughes looks at the implications of having large quantities of variable renewable energy on an alternating current (AC) grid. Do give them a read! With best wishes as always to our readers and the generous donors who make our work possible, Harry Harry Wilkinson is head of policy at Net Zero Watch. As always, please don’t reply to this email address, which is not monitored.
|